tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7107887.post2106693300456163385..comments2024-03-27T08:37:26.489-04:00Comments on Not Another Episcopal Church Blog: Something Really is Wrong With Our Bloody Lectionary Today (Redux)Undergroundpewsterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10182191422663119484noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7107887.post-54163862910309505622012-06-22T19:06:32.061-04:002012-06-22T19:06:32.061-04:00Correct, that is why the URL is what it is.Correct, that is why the URL is what it is.Undergroundpewsterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10182191422663119484noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7107887.post-79927320005378383962012-06-22T18:57:58.313-04:002012-06-22T18:57:58.313-04:00I assume you apply it to yourselves first, Pewster...I assume you apply it to yourselves first, Pewster, true?Small Farmer in The Cityhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14271910054588466598noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7107887.post-37342864462742755212012-06-22T18:51:38.152-04:002012-06-22T18:51:38.152-04:00Keep reading and you will see that gets plenty of ...Keep reading and you will see that gets plenty of attention around here as we study the actions of 815.Undergroundpewsterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10182191422663119484noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7107887.post-16998996738136362112012-06-22T18:17:28.933-04:002012-06-22T18:17:28.933-04:00Inasmuch as the 1928 BCP lacked the cited verse yo...Inasmuch as the 1928 BCP lacked the cited verse you can hardly accuse the TEC of foisting it on folks as a matter of political correctness. <br /><br />I am more concerned that Prov 6:16-18 are not given nearly as much attention by folks in South Carolina as Romans 1:26,27...perhaps Underground Pewster can explain that to us?Small Farmer in The Cityhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14271910054588466598noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7107887.post-50863308554926350212012-06-20T14:35:33.218-04:002012-06-20T14:35:33.218-04:00Thanks Brian, I am left mulling over the possibili...Thanks Brian, I am left mulling over the possibility that these verses upset the Victorians. They shouldn't upset modern sensibilities now should they?Undergroundpewsterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10182191422663119484noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7107887.post-51227854070554919282012-06-20T14:04:51.700-04:002012-06-20T14:04:51.700-04:00I found this helpful in understanding the 'omi...I found this helpful in understanding the 'omission' from the 1928: http://haligweorc.wordpress.com/2012/06/20/pedantic-lectionary-note-on-romans-1/Brian Candowhttp://althoughweareunworthy.blogspot.canoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7107887.post-56994839994560531412012-06-20T09:42:18.143-04:002012-06-20T09:42:18.143-04:00I have been checking around and it seems that thes...I have been checking around and it seems that these verses have been missing for a long time according to Lowell's blog, this was evident in the 1928 Prayer Book in which the second lesson for Evening Prayer on the 7th Sunday after Trinity was Romans 1:17-21, 28-32.<br /><br />Hmm...<br /><br />Political correct scripture reading is nothing new is it?<br /><br />Is it healthy?Undergroundpewsterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10182191422663119484noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7107887.post-52092534712297989132012-06-20T09:33:56.783-04:002012-06-20T09:33:56.783-04:00I was wondering if you knew if Romans 1.26,27 is m...I was wondering if you knew if Romans 1.26,27 is missing from the Roman Catholic Lectionary?Brian Candowhttp://althoughweareunworthy.blogspot.canoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7107887.post-65572657587776544812012-06-20T09:15:30.088-04:002012-06-20T09:15:30.088-04:00Cha-Ching!Cha-Ching!Undergroundpewsterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10182191422663119484noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7107887.post-16641819760511088652012-06-20T08:35:43.922-04:002012-06-20T08:35:43.922-04:00The next step will be to renumber the verses and p...The next step will be to renumber the verses and pretend the omissions never existed. <br /><br />Winston Smith called. He wants his job back.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com