MEAN, really meanwhile in Canada

 Oh Canada!

From Spiked,

There is a tiny rural township in Ontario, Canada, just over the border from the US state of Minnesota, that glories in the name of Emo. Emo has a population of just 1,300, and until fairly recently was known (though not by many) for its picturesque waterfront park, its annual Rainy River Agricultural Fair and its catch-and-release fishing tournament, the Emo Walleye Classic. It looks idyllic, with simple straggles of wooden houses and vivid verdure bordering the enormous Clearwater Lake.

But no. It turns out that Emo is a false paradise, a hotbed of hate. All that sleepy angling and riparian tranquillity is a front. Prejudice and bigotry reign in the hearts of these simple townsfolk, for which they must be punished. Last month, the human-rights tribunal of Ontario ordered the town to pay $10,000 to an organisation called Borderland Pride, which brought a case against Emo for committing a supposedly terrible crime back in June 2020: the town council had refused to declare June 2020 as Pride Month. The horror!

The tribunal ruling also noted that Emo failed to fly an ‘LGBTQ2 rainbow flag’. The shame of it! (It turns out that Emo doesn’t actually have a flagpole to attach the sacred standard, or indeed a lesser pennant of any kind, but that’s by the by.)

And that’s not all. Town mayor Harold McQuaker made an apparently outrageous statement at a council meeting. He said: ‘There’s no flag being flown for the straight people.’ For this, he must personally stump up another $5,000. This was, the tribunal decided, a ‘demeaning and disparaging’ remark that ‘constituted discrimination’ under Ontario’s human-rights code. Mayor McQuaker and all his staff must now attend special human-rights training.

Borderland Pride, which describes itself as a ‘2SLGBTQIA+ Pride organisation’, has welcomed the decision. It has also magnanimously offered to refund a third of its award directly to the town library on the condition that the library hosts a drag-queen storytelling event ‘on a date of our choosing’. (That ‘2S’, by the way, stands for ‘two spirit’ – referring to a Native American belief in gender non-binariness that may not actually have ever been a thing, and that many actual native Americans have never heard of. It’s a bit like if gays in the UK demanded extra-special recognition for being wicker men.)

We joke about the ‘rainbow mafia’, but this behaviour is pretty close to actual mafia tactics. ‘Nice little town you got here. Very pretty. Don’t see any rainbow flags though… Would be a pity if anything were to happen to your town.’

We can see this also in the UK with the recent hoo-hah over rainbow armbands in football. Sam Morsy of Ipswich Town has refused to wear one, and Marc Guehi of Crystal Palace has added a religious slogan, ‘I ♥ ️ JESUS’, to his.

The arm bands are nominally there to tackle homophobia in football. This is obviously nonsense. Nobody’s prejudice against homosexuality is going to be altered in any way by the sight of a gaudy accessory. Football has been awash with rainbows for many years, and yet still there are apparently no gay top-flight footballers (which seems statistically unlikely, let’s face it).

What the rows about flags in Emo and laces in Ipswich make clear is that rainbow ubiquity is not about ‘tolerance’ or ‘acceptance’ or ‘inclusion’. It’s a demonstration of force, and a display of political power. The FA forbids political and / or religious slogans, so Guehi’s Jesus message may get him into hot water. But the rainbow doesn’t count as political, somehow, despite its association with hotly contested and contentious topics like transgenderism, which you may have noticed is a bit of a hot potato.

The transparently obvious rainbow threat goes like this:

‘Our political cause is so holy that it isn’t a political cause at all. It’s about “rights”, and just everyday niceness. So, to reject our cause is to reject niceness. And you wouldn’t want to be known as that kind of person, would you now?’

There have been certain hopeful signs of late – the Cass Review in the UK, the enthusiastic rejection of the Democrats’ gender madness in the US – and it’s tempting to think that LGBTQ+ rubbish might finally be drawing to an end. But the Emo and FA stories are a reminder of how deeply embedded the Pride ideology is in Western institutions. (An ideology that, it must be remembered, is now only tangentially related to homosexuality.)

Even if some of the bigger insanities may be on their way out, groups like Borderland Pride and Stonewall still have their dirty mitts all over civil society. It’s going to be a long haul, winkling them out street by street with (metaphorical) cold steel.

Gareth Roberts is a screenwriter and novelist, best known for his work on Doctor Who.

Oh dear me Canada I meant.

The Baptist

We get a further introduction to John the Baptist is this Sunday's reading from Luke 3:7-18,

John said to the crowds that came out to be baptized by him, ‘You brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the wrath to come? Bear fruits worthy of repentance. Do not begin to say to yourselves, “We have Abraham as our ancestor”; for I tell you, God is able from these stones to raise up children to Abraham. Even now the axe is lying at the root of the trees; every tree therefore that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.’

And the crowds asked him, ‘What then should we do?’ In reply he said to them, ‘Whoever has two coats must share with anyone who has none; and whoever has food must do likewise.’ Even tax-collectors came to be baptized, and they asked him, ‘Teacher, what should we do?’ He said to them, ‘Collect no more than the amount prescribed for you.’ Soldiers also asked him, ‘And we, what should we do?’ He said to them, ‘Do not extort money from anyone by threats or false accusation, and be satisfied with your wages.’

As the people were filled with expectation, and all were questioning in their hearts concerning John, whether he might be the Messiah, John answered all of them by saying, ‘I baptize you with water; but one who is more powerful than I is coming; I am not worthy to untie the thong of his sandals. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire. His winnowing-fork is in his hand, to clear his threshing-floor and to gather the wheat into his granary; but the chaff he will burn with unquenchable fire.’

So, with many other exhortations, he proclaimed the good news to the people.

You have a choice. Will you be wheat, or will you be chaff? 

"Reposition(ing) the Messiah story so that it may better resonate with a 21st-century queer audience"

On the heels of last week's post on Handel's Messiah getting cancelled in Finland, we find a performance of Messiah that should have been cancelled. 

From The Catholic Herald,

A London museum is to present a drag-themed reinterpretation of Handel’s Messiah this December.

The Foundling Museum in Camden, London, will show “A Queer Georgian Yuletide: Handel’s Queer Messiah”, which is designed to retell the story so that it “better resonates” with a modern audience.

Les Bougiewill, the vocal and period-instrument ensemble performing the piece, describes the pastiche as an exploration of “what the concept of a saviour or ‘messiah’ means from a queer perspective: in secular, sacred, interpersonal, and intrapersonal senses.”

The group note that “your queer Georgian ‘messiah’ might differ from another’s Queer Georgian ‘messiah’”.

The ensemble also informs prospective attendees that, while the music will remain the same, the text—originally taken from the King James Bible and the Coverdale Psalter—will be “modified” to create “a more universal and inclusive story”. Audiences are encouraged to “expect an evening of intellectually-informed fun”...

...Catholic theologian Dr. Gavin Ashenden, a former chaplain to Her late Majesty the Queen, commented: “They could write their own text and their own music, but perversity is never very creative, and in any case we now know that the great delight taken by the cultural revolution is in blaspheming and perverting beauty and holiness, so of course they would make a beeline for Handel‘s Messiah.

“The exquisite beauty of the music and the sacred resonance of the text are ideal material for blasphemy and perversion if that is your primary motivation. The careful cosmetic choice of words suggesting that the crusade for sexualised hedonism is more inclusive than the love of God for broken people is a triumph of propaganda over truth.

“Such language is used to try and deflate the voice of protest in the name of outraged Love. Those who love God and the beauty of His rescue mission, which Messiah so poignantly captures, should indeed protest, expressing pain, distress, and disgust at one more episode of degradation by a decadent culture.”

Despite this, the Foundling Museum asserts that “for Handel, Messiah can be seen as a fluid document intended to be adapted for different audiences.” They emphasise that they “do not intend this pastiche of Handel’s Messiah to insult any religious and/or non-religious individuals” but rather aim to “reposition the Messiah story so that it may better resonate with a 21st-century queer audience”. 

I'm with Gavin on this one. 

The Time of Jesus' Baptism

 You have to love Luke's chronology in this Sunday's reading from Luke 3:1-6,

In the fifteenth year of the reign of Emperor Tiberius, when Pontius Pilate was governor of Judea, and Herod was ruler of Galilee, and his brother Philip ruler of the region of Ituraea and Trachonitis, and Lysanias ruler of Abilene, during the high-priesthood of Annas and Caiaphas, the word of God came to John son of Zechariah in the wilderness. He went into all the region around the Jordan, proclaiming a baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of sins, as it is written in the book of the words of the prophet Isaiah,

‘The voice of one crying out in the wilderness:

“Prepare the way of the Lord,

   make his paths straight.

 Every valley shall be filled,

   and every mountain and hill shall be made low,

and the crooked shall be made straight,

 and the rough ways made smooth;

 and all flesh shall see the salvation of God.”

Luke clues us in as to the time when Jesus was baptized by his references to the rulers of the period. There is a margin of error as noted at Time.Graphics,

Tiberius became sole emperor on the death of his adoptive father, Augustus, on 19th August AD 14. However, it is a well- known fact that he had become co-regent with his ailing father two years earlier in AD 12. In that year, he was made supreme military commander over Caesar's armies and prov- inces. Ancient coins from Antioch dated AD 12 display the head of Tiberius and documents attest to his reign being fully in force from that time. Thus, his inauguration in AD 14 as emperor was only a formalisation of a that had begun two years earlier. Therefore, the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius would make it AD 26-27 correlating with the start of Christ's ministry and supporting the AD 30 date as the most likely date of his crucifixion. 

Thank you St. Luke. 

’

Cancelling Messiah

I thought I had seen it all when reruns of Gilligan's Island had trigger warnings before each episode, but now Handel's Messiah is the latest thing to require trigger warnings.

From Faithwire,

A school in Finland has cancelled a concert of Handel’s “Messiah” performed by the Finnish Baroque Orchestra and the Helsinki Chamber Choir over concerns the recital’s Christian themes might offend some students.

Officials with the school hosting the concert in question made the decision after learning about a case in Hämeenlinna, a Finnish city, where a child objected to songs about the life of Jesus performed at an undisclosed school. Ultimately, the National Non-Discrimination and Equality Tribunal decided the non-Christian pupils should be compensated 1,500 euros (or $1,562) for their offense, local outlets reported.

However, on Nov. 19, the city’s Education and Welfare Committee voted 6-5 no payment was due to the offended school students.

The show in Hämeenlinna was one of three performances based on faith-filled themes. The first recital was held in 2022, with subsequent recitals in 2023 and 2024. At least one non-religious student watching the 2022 show was purportedly offended.

If one is "non-religious", how can one be offended? 

Finnish news outlet Helsingin Sanomat reported the “religiosity of the concert was not announced in advance, but [the school] apologized after the concert.” It was only the first show accused of being “discriminatory.”

The title "Messiah" was not enough of an announcement of the religiosity of the concert? 

A hymn was removed from the second performance in 2023 and some apparently voiced concerns about a parish choir at the third event.

“The board also found that the educational institution had neglected its obligation to promote equality,” Helsingin Sanomat reported of the choir singing at the performance. “It held this view, inter alia, because the educational institution did not inform that the choir’s performance had been organized jointly with the congregation.”

I guess they should have invited an Imam to do prayer calls, a Rabbi to sing psalms, and a Hindu priest  to conduct a pujā.

Given the experience in Hämeenlinna, the organizers of the yet-to-be performed concert cancelled the event, citing issues with the religious overtones in the music.

"Overtones"? Once again, the title is "Messiah." 

Oh Finland, Finland, where Messiah is cancelled.

Signs of Things to Come

 This Sunday's reading is from Luke 21:25-36,

‘There will be signs in the sun, the moon, and the stars, and on the earth distress among nations confused by the roaring of the sea and the waves. People will faint from fear and foreboding of what is coming upon the world, for the powers of the heavens will be shaken. Then they will see “the Son of Man coming in a cloud” with power and great glory. Now when these things begin to take place, stand up and raise your heads, because your redemption is drawing near.’

 Then he told them a parable: ‘Look at the fig tree and all the trees; as soon as they sprout leaves you can see for yourselves and know that summer is already near. So also, when you see these things taking place, you know that the kingdom of God is near. Truly I tell you, this generation will not pass away until all things have taken place. Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away.

 ‘Be on guard so that your hearts are not weighed down with dissipation and drunkenness and the worries of this life, and that day does not catch you unexpectedly, like a trap. For it will come upon all who live on the face of the whole earth. Be alert at all times, praying that you may have the strength to escape all these things that will take place, and to stand before the Son of Man.’

The Sun is at its "solar max", but that happens every 11 years. The Moon is getting ready for the next manned moon mission, and tropical storm season just ended. 

Jesus must be talking about signs far greater than these.

This is not something to lose sleep over.

Rather, lose sleep over what will become of your soul when you die if you don't listen to Jesus in this and in all the rest of things and follow him.

Giving Thanks

 Tomorrow we celebrate Thanksgiving. Pewsterspouse and I are going to drive through the flood ravaged mountains of North Carolina to join up with the Pewsterinlaws and their families. We are thankful that so many will be there in spite of all of the aging and health issues present in that clan. 

As for my side, I shall remember those who have gone before, and those who are far away. 

And I shall not forget my Mayflower ancestors, without whom we would not be here or making this trip.

So who should we thank?

God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit of course.

Onward ho!

Pilate's Choice

 This Sunday's reading is from John 18:33-37 contains the following exchange between Jesus and Pilate,

 Then Pilate entered the headquarters again, summoned Jesus, and asked him, ‘Are you the King of the Jews?’ Jesus answered, ‘Do you ask this on your own, or did others tell you about me?’ Pilate replied, ‘I am not a Jew, am I? Your own nation and the chief priests have handed you over to me. What have you done?’ Jesus answered, ‘My kingdom is not from this world. If my kingdom were from this world, my followers would be fighting to keep me from being handed over to the Jews. But as it is, my kingdom is not from here.’ Pilate asked him, ‘So you are a king?’ Jesus answered, ‘You say that I am a king. For this I was born, and for this I came into the world, to testify to the truth. Everyone who belongs to the truth listens to my voice.’

 Pilate must have been irked by this type of answer. He was probably not used to such talk from a prisoner. At this point he asked the famous question (not included in today's reading), 

Verse 38: Pilate said to him, “What is truth?”

Pilate at this point had to decide guilt or innocence  (also not included in today's reading),

After he had said this, he went back outside to the Jews and told them, “I find no guilt in him.

 In the end, Pilate chose to let a mob decide Jesus' fate,

But you have a custom that I should release one man for you at the Passover. So do you want me to release to you the King of the Jews?” They cried out again, “Not this man, but Barabbas!” Now Barabbas was a robber.

Pilate's choice to please the mob over his own verdict is a lesson we and our leaders should take to heart.  

 

The Ultimate Result of "Hate Speech" Laws

I have never been a fan of "Hate Crime" legislation. When one person murders another, a crime has been committed. Why tack on a subjective judgement such as whether or not the crime was done with hateful intent? Where will such accusations eventually take us? 

The answer my friends can be found in the following report from across the Atlantic in The Times, 

 Children are among thousands of people being investigated by police for non-crime hate incidents, The Times can reveal.

Police forces recorded incidents against a nine-year-old who called a primary school classmate a “retard” and against two secondary school girls who said that another pupil smelt “like fish”.

Every kid in my school got called that and worse when I was in K-12 Episcopal schools.   

They were among several cases of children being logged as having committed non-crime hate incidents (NCHIs), according to freedom of information requests to police forces.

Government guidance says that NCHIs are supposed to be recorded for incidents “clearly motivated by intentional hostility” and where there is a real risk of escalation “causing significant harm or a criminal offence”. Classroom incidents that do not amount to crimes are not supposed to be recorded, and neither are incidents involving journalists expressing lawfully held views with no hostility.

However, The Times has found evidence of widespread confusion among police over what types of incident should be recorded.

No 10 said that the Home Office would review its guidance to protect “the fundamental right to free speech” after the journalist Allison Pearson claimed she was being investigated over an NCHI. Essex police say this is inaccurate and have defended their handling of the case.

However, data collected by The Times shows the recording of NCHIs is widespread. More than 13,200 hate incidents were recorded in the 12 months to June this year, according to statistics from 45 of Britain’s 48 police forces.

Critics have asked whether the recording of non-crime hate incidents is an appropriate use of police resources, particularly in cases involving children...

...Lord Macdonald of River Glaven, a former director of public prosecutions added: “Five years down the line, when they apply for a job, they might not get it. And that might be as a result of a so-called non-crime hate incident recorded against their name that was entirely baseless, entirely motivated by spite or misunderstanding or whatever.

“I mean, the idea that the police are recording the name of a child because that child has described another child as smelling like a fish is just beyond belief.”

Yep, this is where all "hate" legislation eventually leads.

Words of Warning

This Sunday's reading is Mark 13:1-8,

As he came out of the temple, one of his disciples said to him, ‘Look, Teacher, what large stones and what large buildings!’ Then Jesus asked him, ‘Do you see these great buildings? Not one stone will be left here upon another; all will be thrown down.’

 When he was sitting on the Mount of Olives opposite the temple, Peter, James, John, and Andrew asked him privately, ‘Tell us, when will this be, and what will be the sign that all these things are about to be accomplished?’ Then Jesus began to say to them, ‘Beware that no one leads you astray. Many will come in my name and say, “I am he!” and they will lead many astray. When you hear of wars and rumors of wars, do not be alarmed; this must take place, but the end is still to come. For nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom; there will be earthquakes in various places; there will be famines. This is but the beginning of the birth pangs.

The Temple was thrown down, and the birth pangs of the early Church were dreadful. 

Wars and famines keep coming and going.

Being led astray happens all the time. A good defense against false shepherds, prophets, teachings, interpretations, and denominations is to build biblical literacy, and to engage in Bible study with other orthodox Christians. 

Don't Expect Any Change

Justin Welby has resigned as Archbishop of Canterbury, and it wasn't because Trump won, or was it? I don't expect any improvement with the next one whoever it may be.

 Statement from the Archbishop of Canterbury

12/11/2024

Having sought the gracious permission of His Majesty The King, I have decided to resign as Archbishop of Canterbury.

The Makin Review has exposed the long-maintained conspiracy of silence about the heinous abuses of John Smyth.

When I was informed in 2013 and told that police had been notified, I believed wrongly that an appropriate resolution would follow. 

It is very clear that I must take personal and institutional responsibility for the long and retraumatising period between 2013 and 2024. 

It is my duty to honour my Constitutional and church responsibilities, so exact timings will be decided once a review of necessary obligations has been completed, including those in England and in the Anglican Communion. 

I hope this decision makes clear how seriously the Church of England understands the need for change and our profound commitment to creating a safer church. As I step down I do so in sorrow with all victims and survivors of abuse. 

The last few days have renewed my long felt and profound sense of shame at the historic safeguarding failures of the Church of England. For nearly twelve years I have struggled to introduce improvements. It is for others to judge what has been done.

In the meantime, I will follow through on my commitment to meet victims. I will delegate all my other current responsibilities for safeguarding until the necessary risk assessment process is complete.

I ask everyone to keep my wife Caroline and my children in their prayers. They have been my most important support throughout my ministry, and I am eternally grateful for their sacrifice. Caroline led the spouses’ programme during the Lambeth Conference and has travelled tirelessly in areas of conflict supporting the most vulnerable, the women, and those who care for them locally.

I believe that stepping aside is in the best interests of the Church of England, which I dearly love and which I have been honoured to serve. I pray that this decision points us back towards the love that Jesus Christ has for every one of us. 

For above all else, my deepest commitment is to the person of Jesus Christ, my saviour and my God; the bearer of the sins and burdens of the world, and the hope of every person.

Things of Value

 This Sunday's reading is Mark 12:38-44,

As he taught, he said, ‘Beware of the scribes, who like to walk around in long robes, and to be greeted with respect in the market-places, and to have the best seats in the synagogues and places of honour at banquets! They devour widows’ houses and for the sake of appearance say long prayers. They will receive the greater condemnation.’

He sat down opposite the treasury, and watched the crowd putting money into the treasury. Many rich people put in large sums. A poor widow came and put in two small copper coins, which are worth a penny. Then he called his disciples and said to them, ‘Truly I tell you, this poor widow has put in more than all those who are contributing to the treasury. For all of them have contributed out of their abundance; but she out of her poverty has put in everything she had, all she had to live on.’

Jesus turned the ancient world on its head with these two observations of human behavior, and the divine judgement if each. 

His words are just as true today as our celebrity engrossed culture needs to beware of the rich and famous, many of whom went out of their way to try to influence our last election. How often those celebs show up in their designer attire, and are seated in places of honor.

But the first shall be last, and the last shall be first.

 

 

Prayer for an election

 In the back of the 2019 ACNA Book of Common Prayer you can find prayer #31, "For an election."

Let us pray, 

Almighty God, to whom we must account for all our powers

and privileges: Guide and direct, we humbly pray, the minds

of all those who are called to elect fit persons to serve in

the United States of America. Grant that in the exercise of our choice we may

promote your glory, and the welfare of this nation. This we ask

for the sake of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. Amen.

"There is no other commandment greater than these"

 This Sunday's reading is from Mark 12:28-34,

One of the scribes came near and heard them disputing with one another, and seeing that he answered them well, he asked him, ‘Which commandment is the first of all?’ Jesus answered, ‘The first is, “Hear, O Israel: the Lord our God, the Lord is one; you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind, and with all your strength.” The second is this, “You shall love your neighbour as yourself.” There is no other commandment greater than these.’ Then the scribe said to him, ‘You are right, Teacher; you have truly said that “he is one, and besides him there is no other”; and “to love him with all the heart, and with all the understanding, and with all the strength”, and “to love one’s neighbour as oneself”,—this is much more important than all whole burnt-offerings and sacrifices.’ When Jesus saw that he answered wisely, he said to him, ‘You are not far from the kingdom of God.’ After that no one dared to ask him any question.

Is it humanly possible to keep these commandments all the time?

I think not, and that is why we need a Savior.

 

Long Live the New Archbishop!

Today, Wednesday, October 30, 2024, you are invited to join others from around the Anglican Church in North America and the Anglican world for a special Service of the Investiture of Archbishop Steve Wood.

This historic service, similar to a commissioning, will be held in Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina (just outside of Charleston) at 6:30 p.m. at Seacoast Church.

Livestream from the event will be shown on the ACNA’s Youtube channel here or on the ACNA Facebook page.

I am so glad that ACNA has Steve Wood to look after us rather than that other Archbishop across the pond who doesn't recognize ACNA as an Anglican province. Why, you say? Just take a look at what is going on in merry olde England,

From The Church Times,

The Archbishop of Canterbury was “giving a personal view” when he told a podcast this week that all sexual activity should be “within a committed relationship” — whether marriage or a civil partnership — Lambeth Palace has clarified in a statement.

“There is no consensus among the bishops on this question, and the Church remains deeply divided” on the issue, the statement said.

During an episode of The Rest is Politics, recorded in the crypt of Lambeth Palace and published on Monday, one of the presenters, Alastair Campbell, returned to a question that he had put to the Archbishop in an interview in 2017: “Is gay sex sinful?” He recalled that the Archbishop’s answer then had been: “I haven’t got a good answer,” and asked whether he now had a “better answer”.

The Archbishop said that he did: “What the Archbishop of York and I and the Bishops, by a majority, by no means unanimous, and the Church is deeply split over this — where we’ve come to is to say that all sexual activity should be within a committed relationship, and whether it’s straight or gay.

“In other words, we are not giving up on the idea that sex is within marriage or civil partnership, or whether marriage is civil or religious, and that, therefore, we have put forward a proposal that, where people have been through a civil partnership or a same-sex marriage, equal marriage, under the 2014 Act, they should be able to come along to a church and have a service of prayer and blessing for them in their lives together.”

Justin Welby has renounced the wisdom God has provided us in the Bible.   

The Anglican Communion is dead, long live the new Archbishop of ACNA!

 

Faith Healing

This week's reading from Mark 10:46-52 contains an interesting miracle healing,

They came to Jericho. As he and his disciples and a large crowd were leaving Jericho, Bartimaeus son of Timaeus, a blind beggar, was sitting by the roadside. When he heard that it was Jesus of Nazareth, he began to shout out and say, ‘Jesus, Son of David, have mercy on me!’ Many sternly ordered him to be quiet, but he cried out even more loudly, ‘Son of David, have mercy on me!’ Jesus stood still and said, ‘Call him here.’ And they called the blind man, saying to him, ‘Take heart; get up, he is calling you.’ So throwing off his cloak, he sprang up and came to Jesus. Then Jesus said to him, ‘What do you want me to do for you?’ The blind man said to him, ‘My teacher, let me see again.’ Jesus said to him, ‘Go; your faith has made you well.’ Immediately he regained his sight and followed him on the way.

First, notice how the blind beggar perceives Jesus as the or a "Son of David",

"Son of David" refers to the promise God made David that the king would have an heir who would reign over Israel forever (2 Samuel 7:12–16); God also promised to "raise up for David a righteous Branch," the Messiah, who will rescue Israel from her enemies (Jeremiah 23:5–6). Jesus is descended from David on both His mother Mary's side (Luke 3:23–38) and His adopted father Joseph's side (Matthew 1:1–16). Bible Ref.

Next that although Bartimaeus' sight was restored by his faith, it wasn't until Jesus' judgement was voiced that Bartimaeus was healed.

I have seen some miraculous healings in my time, and when a patient or family member tried to give credit to the doctor, I would shift the credit to Whom it belongs, and when the patient persisted in crediting the medical staff, I would try to explain that God put them there, and it was He who gave them the knowledge to participate in the healing process. 

Still, how many of us are quick to give credit to the antibiotic when we recover from an infection or when an aspirin relieves our headache?  

Make sure to perceive and acknowledge the actions of the Son of David in all these things 

The answer to a frightful future

Wise advice from Fr. Dwight Longenecker at The Imaginative Conservative,

"The issue of women’s ordination, therefore, is one comparatively minor aspect of the much larger issue of our times: the destruction and distortion of human sexuality and ultimately the destruction and distortion of the human race itself.

What is the answer to this frightful future? Angry rants by conservative preachers will not suffice. Neither will reasoned arguments by philosophers or theologians. The answer to any distortion of reality is the positive action taken by sane, healthy, honest people.

Young men and women need to marry, stay married, have lots of children and show in their words and works the vibrant attractiveness of all that is simple, beautiful, good, and true. Then their pro-life and pro-family choice needs to be supported by their extended family, community, church, and society."

I would add that in addition to demonstrating good works, that young men and women need to spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ to the world by their words as well.

Party Politics

 This Sunday's reading is Mark 10:35-45, and here we see party politics coming into play among the disciples,

James and John, the sons of Zebedee, came forward to him and said to him, ‘Teacher, we want you to do for us whatever we ask of you.’ And he said to them, ‘What is it you want me to do for you?’ And they said to him, ‘Grant us to sit, one at your right hand and one at your left, in your glory.’ But Jesus said to them, ‘You do not know what you are asking. Are you able to drink the cup that I drink, or be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with?’ They replied, ‘We are able.’ Then Jesus said to them, ‘The cup that I drink you will drink; and with the baptism with which I am baptized, you will be baptized; but to sit at my right hand or at my left is not mine to grant, but it is for those for whom it has been prepared.’

 When the ten heard this, they began to be angry with James and John. So Jesus called them and said to them, ‘You know that among the Gentiles those whom they recognize as their rulers lord it over them, and their great ones are tyrants over them. But it is not so among you; but whoever wishes to become great among you must be your servant, and whoever wishes to be first among you must be slave of all. For the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life a ransom for many.’

Pretty self explanatory... right?

Jesus' closest followers got it wrong at times. 

Is it any wonder that we do too?

 

When politicians create a "social valuation of life"

 I highly recommend reading this article by Amanda Achtman at Public Discourse. She discusses the development of "euthanasia centers" in Nazi Germany where the "unfit" were killed and the methods for the genocide of Jewish people were "perfected." 

These,

"euthanasia memorials do not receive nearly the volume of visitors that flock to the more notorious death camps; most people are unaware of the links between them."

We must remember this history lest we repeat it as more and more nations accept the notion of "euthanasia." 

Here is an excerpt, 

The medical records of the euthanasia victims list such things as: “congenital feeble-mindedness,” “social nonconformity,” “anxious relational psychosis,” “unable to work,” “incurable,” “danger to the public,” “unstable and dishonest,” “sullen and unapproachable,” “senile dementia,” etc., as conditions that obviously warranted death.

Ambiguous as these criteria are, they were used to reduce people to conditions that disqualified them from belonging in the world. The person with a name became the mere instance of a type. Doctors would refer to patients by their illness, disability, or inner struggle as a kind of shorthand that eclipsed the person. This is a particularly insidious form of dehumanization, when a person’s entire identity is reduced to a diagnosis, prognosis, or accessibility aid.

In short, a consensus arose around a social valuation of life, which became difficult to dispute. The rationale for killing people became entrenched under the guise of general agreement. The precedent became part of the argument. If the general presumption becomes that the rationale is logical, if there is a sense that fungible criteria are legitimate, then people are susceptible to being classified within them, regardless of whether they would have put themselves in that category.

Today we might instinctively look at Nazi criteria for death as utterly baseless, but at the time seasoned medical professionals regarded them as reasonable. To have a sense of history is to grasp the arbitrariness of such criteria. When it comes to killing patients, there is no way to get the criteria just right because the stamp of medical approval sends a social message that there is a category of persons who should not exist.

Perplexed then greatly astounded

In this Sunday's reading from Mark 10:17-31, Jesus teaches us about how we attain eternal life

As he was setting out on a journey, a man ran up and knelt before him, and asked him, ‘Good Teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?’ Jesus said to him, ‘Why do you call me good? No one is good but God alone. You know the commandments: “You shall not murder; You shall not commit adultery; You shall not steal; You shall not bear false witness; You shall not defraud; Honour your father and mother.” ’ He said to him, ‘Teacher, I have kept all these since my youth.’ Jesus, looking at him, loved him and said, ‘You lack one thing; go, sell what you own, and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; then come, follow me.’ When he heard this, he was shocked and went away grieving, for he had many possessions.

Then Jesus looked around and said to his disciples, ‘How hard it will be for those who have wealth to enter the kingdom of God!’ And the disciples were perplexed at these words. But Jesus said to them again, ‘Children, how hard it is to enter the kingdom of God! It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.’ They were greatly astounded and said to one another, ‘Then who can be saved?’ Jesus looked at them and said, ‘For mortals it is impossible, but not for God; for God all things are possible.’

 Peter began to say to him, ‘Look, we have left everything and followed you.’ Jesus said, ‘Truly I tell you, there is no one who has left house or brothers or sisters or mother or father or children or fields, for my sake and for the sake of the good news, who will not receive a hundredfold now in this age—houses, brothers and sisters, mothers and children, and fields, with persecutions—and in the age to come eternal life. But many who are first will be last, and the last will be first.’

I noticed the tension growing as the disciples were first perplexed and then greatly astounded at Jesus' words. 

The real astounding moment is when Jesus explains that for God, passing a camel through the eye of a needle is easy.

 

"Floods came and the wind blew"

We are still cleaning up from hurricane Helene, but the Pewster-in-law's place in Florida is in the bullseye for the next storm. They are snow birds and are only there in the winter so they are safe in their summer primary home. My friend on Sanibel Island has evacuated. 

I was born on an island that was wiped out by a hurricane over a century ago, and I grew up in hurricane country riding out many in my childhood home which was seriously shaking during one storm. My father taught me how to prepare, and to never buy a house in certain flood prone areas or to own a beach front home. 

I feel for people like my friend who live on or near the beach, but I remember my father's advice as well as the words of Jesus, 

“Everyone then who hears these words of mine and does them will be like a wise man who built his house on the rock.  And the rain fell, and the floods came, and the winds blew and beat on that house, but it did not fall, because it had been founded on the rock.  And everyone who hears these words of mine and does not do them will be like a foolish man who built his house on the sand.  And the rain fell, and the floods came, and the winds blew and beat against that house, and it fell, and great was the fall of it.” Matthew 7:24-27

Still, we build on sand anyway, and the floods will come some day to wash it all away.

So as to not leave you on a sour note remember,

"Many waters cannot quench love,

    neither can floods drown it." - Song of Solomon 8:7a

Let the floods come, God loves us and watches over us. We just would do better if we followed his advice. 

God's plan or yours?

 While this Sunday the Revised Common Lectionary cuts out a large part of Hebrews chapter 1 and a slice of Hebrews chapter 2, I looked at the Gospel reading and was left wondering how the revisionist preacher would handle it.

Mark 10:2-16

Some Pharisees came, and to test him they asked, ‘Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife?’ He answered them, ‘What did Moses command you?’ They said, ‘Moses allowed a man to write a certificate of dismissal and to divorce her.’ But Jesus said to them, ‘Because of your hardness of heart he wrote this commandment for you. But from the beginning of creation, “God made them male and female.” “For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.” So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.’

Then in the house the disciples asked him again about this matter. He said to them, ‘Whoever divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery against her; and if she divorces her husband and marries another, she commits adultery.’

 People were bringing little children to him in order that he might touch them; and the disciples spoke sternly to them. But when Jesus saw this, he was indignant and said to them, ‘Let the little children come to me; do not stop them; for it is to such as these that the kingdom of God belongs. Truly I tell you, whoever does not receive the kingdom of God as a little child will never enter it.’ And he took them up in his arms, laid his hands on them, and blessed them.

I imagine that the typical revisionist preacher will avoid talking about the first two paragraphs altogether and focus on the third one, or he/she/it will not even touch the Gospel reading and instead focus on where he/she/it took the grandchildren last week.

 When Jesus talks about human sexual relationships, he goes back to the beginning, a time before sin, and God's design for us. 

When the revisionist talks about human sexual relationships, he/she/it must push things to the present and humanity's designs, so he/she/it has to ignore Mark chapter 10 among other things.

Who will you follow, God or man?

Medical Necessity?

Power was finally restored on Monday afternoon, and we are cleaning up from the damage done by hurricane Helene. We are still waiting for the flood waters to recede. Estimates are that things should be back to normal levels by October 9. 

Meanwhile, the rest of the world remains upside down as trans craziness continues.

From Fox News,

A federal judge has ruled that it would be unconstitutional for an Indiana prison to deny a transgender inmate sex reassignment surgery following the inmate's lawsuit against the facility.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) sued the Indiana Department of Corrections last year on behalf of a transgender inmate, Jonathan C. Richardson, also known as Autumn Cordellionè, who was convicted of strangling his 11-month-old stepdaughter to death in 2001.

Indiana law, however, prohibits the Department of Corrections from using taxpayer dollars to fund sex reassignment surgeries for inmates. However, the ACLU argues in the lawsuit, filed on Aug. 28, 2023, that the law is a violation of the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of "cruel and unusual punishment."

The surgery for Richardson, who is serving out a 55-year prison sentence for reckless homicide, "is a medical necessity," according to the ACLU lawsuit.

Judge Richard Young agreed with the ACLU's claims and ruled in favor of Cordellioné last week.

"Specifically, Ms. Cordellioné has shown that her gender dysphoria is a serious medical need, and that, despite other treatments Defendant has provided her to treat her gender dysphoria, she requires gender-affirming surgery to prevent a risk of serious bodily and psychological harm," the ruling states.

The DOC must now take "all reasonable actions" to ensure Cordellioné undergoes sex surgery, according to the order.

Since when is a "gender-affirming" surgery a medical necessity? 

The Medicare definition of medically necessary is, 

Health care services or supplies needed to diagnose or treat an illness, injury, condition, disease or its symptoms and that meet accepted standards of medicine. 

 The insurance company Cigna is more specific,

• "Medically Necessary" or "Medical Necessity" means health care services that a physician, exercising prudent clinical judgment, would provide to a patient. The service must be:
• For the purpose of evaluating, diagnosing, or treating an illness, injury, disease, or its symptoms
• In accordance with the generally accepted standards of medical practice
• Clinically appropriate, in terms of type, frequency, extent, site, and duration, and considered effective for the patient's illness, injury, or disease
• Not primarily for the convenience of the patient, health care provider, or other physicians or health care providers
• Not more costly than an alternative service or sequence of services at least as likely to produce equivalent therapeutic or diagnostic results as to the diagnosis or treatment of that patient's illness, injury, or disease

For these purposes, "generally accepted standards of medical practice" means:

• Standards that are based on credible scientific evidence published in peer-reviewed, medical literature generally recognized by the relevant medical community
• Physician Specialty Society recommendations
• The views of physicians practicing in the relevant clinical area
• Any other relevant factors

I know there are physicians who would testify that this man's surgery meets the Medicare definition, but an equal or greater number would argue that it does not. 

Cigna would turn him down because of the lack of 

"credible scientific evidence published in peer-reviewed, medical literature..."

This murderer may get away with murder at the expense of the taxpayers. 

I guess if it keeps him from impregnating any female prisoners if he is in a (female prison) then it might be reasonable. 

But if he is in a male prison..

I don't want to think about that.

Thanks be to God

 Because of hurricane Helene, we are dealing with a twisted knee, a barked shin, flood waters, downed trees, no power, and no internet except using phones at present so I am typing this short post on my mobile app listening to the generators and chainsaws around me. 

The Psalm for today reminds me that if not for the grace of God, things could be worse. 

124 Nisi quia Dominus

1 If the Lord had not been on our side, *
let Israel now say;

2 If the Lord had not been on our side, *
when enemies rose up against us;

3 Then would they have swallowed us up alive *
in their fierce anger toward us;

4 Then would the waters have overwhelmed us *
and the torrent gone over us;

5 Then would the raging waters *
have gone right over us.

6 Blessed be the Lord! *
he has not given us over to be a prey for their teeth.

7 We have escaped like a bird from the snare of the fowler; *
the snare is broken, and we have escaped.

8 Our help is in the Name of the Lord, *
the maker of heaven and earth.

Our house is high and dry, but the waters have risen through our boat house and the waves from 60 mph winds carried away our neighbor’s pier and parts of ours. Many of our neighbors are on lower ground and will have more problems so pray for them.

We are fine because our trust is in the Lord.

Queer Theory Going Atomic

The LGBTqrsetc movement used some bizarre arguments when they worked to revise traditional interpretations of Biblical sexual morality. These revisionist ideas caught on with certain denominations. Those denominations are currently in a death spiral.

Where will the LGBTqrstetc forces strike next? Well they dropped a bomb in the "Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists" when they published last year, "Queering nuclear weapons: How LGBTQ+ inclusion strengthens security and reshapes disarmament." 

Read it all if you dare. Here is an example, 

Queer identity is also relevant for the nuclear field because it informs theories that aim to change how officials, experts, and the public think about nuclear weapons. Queer theory is a field of study, closely related to feminist theory, that examines sex- and gender-based norms. It shines a light on the harm done by nuclear weapons through uranium mining, nuclear tests, and the tax money spent on nuclear weapons ($60 billion annually in the United States) instead of on education, infrastructure, and welfare. The queer lens prioritizes the rights and well-being of people over the abstract idea of national security, and it challenges the mainstream understanding of nuclear weapons—questioning whether they truly deter nuclear war, stabilize geopolitics, and reduce the likelihood of conventional war. Queer theory asks: Who created these ideas? How are they being upheld? Whose interests do they serve? And whose experiences are being excluded?

...Queer theory is also about rejecting binary choices and zero-sum thinking, such as the tenet that nuclear deterrence creates security and disarmament creates vulnerability. It identifies the assumptions and interests these ideas are built on—and imagines alternatives that serve a broader range of interests, including those of the invisible and resource-stripped.

Indeed, queer theory helps us not only see the bad of a world with nuclear weapons, but also imagine the good of a world without them. It envisions using the resources freed up by nuclear disarmament to build structures that tangibly increase people’s safety and well-being through healthcare, social housing, etc. In this scenario, the more than $100 billion that nuclear-armed states spend on nuclear weapons every year could be used to address the climate crisis, which could kill up to 83 million people by 2100. 

Disarmament, tied to climate change.. genius!  

If we follow this reasoning, we are doomed to the same fate as those denominations I referenced earlier. 

 The arguments are so weak and such a stretch that I hope that no one other than the authors take them seriously. 

These people are a few cans short of a six pack.

I think the "troll" that tweeted, 

“They should not allow mentally ill people near weapons of mass destruction.”

in response to a December 2022 panel discussion on LGBTQ+ identity in the nuclear weapons space was probably right.

The Revised Common Lectionary Strikes Out Again

This week the Revised Common Lectionary (RCL) used in many churches once again strikes through parts of the Epistle of James. Initially, I could not figure out the reasons for this, but upon further reflection with Pewsterspouse, I think James words offend the zeitgeist. 

James 3:13-4:3,7-8

Who is wise and understanding among you? Show by your good life that your works are done with gentleness born of wisdom. But if you have bitter envy and selfish ambition in your hearts, do not be boastful and false to the truth. Such wisdom does not come down from above, but is earthly, unspiritual, devilish. For where there is envy and selfish ambition, there will also be disorder and wickedness of every kind. But the wisdom from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, willing to yield, full of mercy and good fruits, without a trace of partiality or hypocrisy. And a harvest of righteousness is sown in peace for those who make peace.

Those conflicts and disputes among you, where do they come from? Do they not come from your cravings that are at war within you? You want something and do not have it; so you commit murder. And you covet something and cannot obtain it; so you engage in disputes and conflicts. You do not have, because you do not ask. You ask and do not receive, because you ask wrongly, in order to spend what you get on your pleasures.

Adulterers! Do you not know that friendship with the world is enmity with God? Therefore whoever wishes to be a friend of the world becomes an enemy of God.  Or do you suppose that it is for nothing that the scripture says, ‘God yearns jealously for the spirit that he has made to dwell in us’?  But he gives all the more grace; therefore it says,

‘God opposes the proud,

   but gives grace to the humble.’

Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you. 8Draw near to God, and he will draw near to you. Cleanse your hands, you sinners, and purify your hearts, you double-minded.

So it is okay for the simple Sunday pewsitters to hear about envy, selfish ambition, cravings, murder, covetousness, and asking wrongly, but don't you dare let them hear about adultery and most of all about PRIDE! That would really go against the spirit of the age now wouldn't it.

 

What Does This Pope Really Believe?

 

Pope Francis speaking recently to young Catholics in Singapore: 

"All the religions are a path to arrive at [or: reach] God. They are  – I make a comparison – like different languages, different idioms [or: dialects] to arrive there. But God is God for everyone. And since God is God for everyone, we are all children of God. 'But my God is more important than yours!' Is this true? There is only one God, and we, our religions are languages, paths to arrive at [or: reach] God."*

I have heard this and other variants of the "all streams flow into the same ocean" theory before, and I cannot square them with the Bible.  

Neither can Robert Gagnon, 

This is an unfortunate pluralistic view that bears no resemblance to the apostolic witness to the gospel in the NT. I hope my FB Catholic friends will agree with this. It is absurd to view all religions as arriving at the same God, with the Christian view of God being "no more important" than any other religious path. There are outright contradictions between the various religions. The God of Jesus is very different from the God of Mohammed, and both of these are even more different than the polytheistic religions of the Sikhs and Hindus. 

The primary NT witness is also that people become adopted children of God when they have faith in Christ. All people are children of God only in the diluted sense that all are created by God. But they do not enter into a covenant or kinship relationship with God until they believe in the gospel about Christ.

There are elements of Francis's message that agree with Paul's Areopagus (Athens) speech in Acts 17, making a bridge to pagans. Yet the most important part of Paul's speech there was left out by Francis: The imperative of proclaiming the gospel and the requisite response of faith in Christ. Without these there is no certain hope of salvation. 

The New Testament witness has an operating missionary premise, namely that sans faith in Jesus, people perish. Faith in Christ is the only certain means of being saved. Everything else is wishful thinking. "There is salvation in no other one" than Jesus. "For there is not even any other name under heaven that has been given to humans by which it is necessary for us to be saved" (Acts 4:12). Only by calling upon the name of Jesus can anyone be placed on a certain path to God. If God has anything else up his proverbial sleave, he hasn't told us about it. You would be a fool to stake your eternal life on something so insecure as a wish for which there is little or no support in the apostolic testimony to Christ.

The language of the RCC Catechism is better but still deficient: 

//The Catholic Church recognizes in other religions that search, among shadows and images, for the God who is unknown yet near since he gives life and breath and all things and wants all men to be saved. Thus, the Church considers all goodness and truth found in these religions as "a preparation for the Gospel and given by him who enlightens all men that they may at length have life."//

The only assured way of receiving life is through faith in Christ. That was the operating premise of the apostles as they took the gospel around the Mediterranean Basin, always assuming that pagans and non-Christian Jews (like the pre-Christian Paul) needed to believe in the gospel about Christ in order to be saved.

*The original Italian reads:

//Tutte le religioni sono un cammino per arrivare a Dio. Sono – faccio un paragone – come diverse lingue, diversi idiomi, per arrivare lì. Ma Dio è Dio per tutti. E poiché Dio è Dio per tutti, noi siamo tutti figli di Dio. “Ma il mio Dio è più importante del tuo!”. È vero questo? C’è un solo Dio, e noi, le nostre religioni sono lingue, cammini per arrivare a Dio. Qualcuno sikh, qualcuno musulmano, qualcuno indù, qualcuno cristiano, ma sono diversi cammini.//

 Yet another reason to not swim the Tiber.

"No one can tame the tongue"

I wish our politicians and television commentators would put James 3:1-12 on the walls of their offices.

Not many of you should become teachers, my brothers and sisters, for you know that we who teach will be judged with greater strictness. For all of us make many mistakes. Anyone who makes no mistakes in speaking is perfect, able to keep the whole body in check with a bridle. If we put bits into the mouths of horses to make them obey us, we guide their whole bodies. Or look at ships: though they are so large that it takes strong winds to drive them, yet they are guided by a very small rudder wherever the will of the pilot directs. So also the tongue is a small member, yet it boasts of great exploits.

How great a forest is set ablaze by a small fire! And the tongue is a fire. The tongue is placed among our members as a world of iniquity; it stains the whole body, sets on fire the cycle of nature, and is itself set on fire by hell. For every species of beast and bird, of reptile and sea creature, can be tamed and has been tamed by the human species, but no one can tame the tongue—a restless evil, full of deadly poison. With it we bless the Lord and Father, and with it we curse those who are made in the likeness of God. From the same mouth come blessing and cursing. My brothers and sisters, this ought not to be so. Does a spring pour forth from the same opening both fresh and brackish water? Can a fig tree, my brothers and sisters, yield olives, or a grapevine figs? No more can salt water yield fresh.

 

Amazing Benefits of Amazing Grace

I sing in a couple of Christian groups so it was interesting to see the health benefits of this.

From Premier Christian News, 

Singing ‘Amazing Grace’ for just ten minutes a day could help reverse the effects of heart disease, according to a new study.

Researchers at the Medical College of Wisconsin investigated how singing various songs impacted the blood vessels of older individuals with heart disease.

The findings revealed that those who regularly sang 'Amazing Grace,' a hymn penned by clergyman and poet John Newton in 1772, experienced the most significant improvements in endothelial function—a key indicator of the health of blood vessels surrounding the heart. 

(This was an exploratory analysis)

The 1968 release ‘Hey Jude’ brought about smaller improvements, as did Dolly Parton’s 1976 hit ‘Jolene’. However, the US folk classic ‘This Land Is Your Land,’ recorded by Woody Guthrie in 1940, showed little impact.

The group recruited 65 participants, mostly in their 60s, who were being treated for heart issues or had previously had a heart attack. Under a singing coach's guidance, they sang four songs while researchers measured changes in blood flow, an important indicator of heart vessel health.

The study, published in medRxiv, found that 22 per cent of volunteers improved blood flow while singing ‘Amazing Grace,’ compared to just ten per cent when singing ‘This Land Is Your Land’.

The research concluded: “Singing along to a pre-recorded instructional video for 30 minutes improved microvascular, but not macrovascular, endothelial function, in older patients with known CAD. Singing should be considered as an accessible and safe therapeutic intervention in an older population who otherwise may have physical or orthopaedic limitations hindering participation in traditional exercise. Future studies should explore the sustained vascular response to singing over weeks to months and explore the potential for “earworm” effects between visits.”

Excuse me, but I have to go to rehearsal now... 

Qui confidunt

This week's Psalm 125 Qui confidunt is a prayer for peace to be upon Israel. I don't know if it will happen in our lifetime, but we should keep on praying.

1 Those who trust in the Lord are like Mount Zion, *

which cannot be moved, but stands fast for ever.

2 The hills stand about Jerusalem; *

so does the Lord stand round about his people,

from this time forth for evermore.

3 The scepter of the wicked shall not hold sway over the land allotted to the just, *

so that the just shall not put their hands to evil.

4 Show your goodness, O Lord, to those who are good *

and to those who are true of heart.

5 As for those who turn aside to crooked ways,

the Lord will lead them away with the evildoers; *

but peace be upon Israel.

If They Only Knew

 From Evangelical Focus,

People living outside their country of birth represent 3.6% of the world’s overall population. Almost half of identify as Christians.

There are over 280 million people in the world who are migrants, a figure that has grown by 83% in the last three decades.

A new report by Pew Research concludes that 47% of these migrants are Christians, while 29% are Muslim and 13% do not identify with a specific religion.

Christians are an estimated 30% of the whole global population but represent almost half of the migrants in the world. Other faith groups such as Muslims and Jews are also highly represented among the migrant communities. Meanwhile, is it the non-religious who are underrepresented among those who had to leave their home country.

Interestingly, the leading countries of origin for Christian migrants were Mexico (11 million), and Russia (8.9 million).

If the anti-Christian left only knew that the vast majority of those coming into the U.S. through our southern border were Christians, they would put up a wall quicker than they could raise the taxes to pay for it. 

 

RCL Strikes Through the Gospel of Mark

The Revised Common Lectionary (RCL) that many churches use does not provide the casual Sunday pewsitter with a complete view of the Bible. The RCL commonly omits sections of the Bible that might be troublesome for progressive preachers to explain away or might sound offensive to modern listeners. The harm that is done is incalculable as pewsitters are taught an expurgated version of the Bible. 

This Sunday is no exception. I added (in red) the verses that were cut.

Mark 7:1-8,14-15,21-23

Now when the Pharisees and some of the scribes who had come from Jerusalem gathered around him, they noticed that some of his disciples were eating with defiled hands, that is, without washing them. (For the Pharisees, and all the Jews, do not eat unless they thoroughly wash their hands, thus observing the tradition of the elders; and they do not eat anything from the market unless they wash it; and there are also many other traditions that they observe, the washing of cups, pots, and bronze kettles.) So the Pharisees and the scribes asked him, ‘Why do your disciples not live according to the tradition of the elders, but eat with defiled hands?’ He said to them, ‘Isaiah prophesied rightly about you hypocrites, as it is written,

“This people honours me with their lips,

   but their hearts are far from me;

7 in vain do they worship me,

   teaching human precepts as doctrines.”

8 You abandon the commandment of God and hold to human tradition.’

9 Then he said to them, ‘You have a fine way of rejecting the commandment of God in order to keep your tradition! For Moses said, “Honour your father and your mother”; and, “Whoever speaks evil of father or mother must surely die.” But you say that if anyone tells father or mother, “Whatever support you might have had from me is Corban” (that is, an offering to God)— then you no longer permit doing anything for a father or mother, thus making void the word of God through your tradition that you have handed on. And you do many things like this.’

14 Then he called the crowd again and said to them, ‘Listen to me, all of you, and understand: 15 there is nothing outside a person that by going in can defile, but the things that come out are what defile.’

17 When he had left the crowd and entered the house, his disciples asked him about the parable. 18 He said to them, ‘Then do you also fail to understand? Do you not see that whatever goes into a person from outside cannot defile, 19 since it enters, not the heart but the stomach, and goes out into the sewer?’ (Thus he declared all foods clean.) 20 And he said, ‘It is what comes out of a person that defiles. 

 21 For it is from within, from the human heart, that evil intentions come: fornication, theft, murder, 22 adultery, avarice, wickedness, deceit, licentiousness, envy, slander, pride, folly. 23 All these evil things come from within, and they defile a person.’

I suspect the "goes out the sewer" bit was too graphic for the editors of the RCL, but I think the other goal was to eliminate the "Thus he declared all foods clean" comment because that essentially destroys the shellfish argument.

If your church uses the RCL, you should probably find another church. If you want to stick it out, you had better open your Bible and get the whole story. 

 

Mother/Father Deemed "Archaic"

 From The Christian Institute 

The words “mother” and “father” are being dropped from the US state of Massachusetts’ family law – in order to “be more inclusive to LGBTQ+ parents”.

The Massachusetts Parentage Act, which comes into force next year, replaces references to biological sex with gender-neutral phrases such as “the person who gave birth” and “other parent”.

The legislation, which affects birth certificates, child custody, and surrogacy, was backed by abortion giant Planned Parenthood in addition to LGBT activist groups such as GLAAD.

The state’s deputy governor Kim Driscoll boasted that the Act pushes “outdated norms aside”, while Senate President Karen Spilka claimed “archaic beliefs and laws no longer stand in your way as a parent”.

The new law replaces “man and woman” with “persons”, and ditches several references to “paternity” for “parentage”.

In addition, the Act enshrines surrogacy into the state’s law for the first time.

In 2022, it was revealed that the US state of Connecticut had ditched the terms mother and father from childbirth documents.

Journalist Colin Wright revealed that the state’s documentation on birth certificates, affidavits and immunization referred to the “birth parent” and “non-birth parent” instead of the mother and father.

To obtain proof of birth, one document stated that a written statement was required “by the birth parent attesting to the date, time, and place of the live birth”.

What's next? 

Will they have to ditch the words "brother" and "sister?" If they do, the Episcopal organization may have to reinstate the archaic word "brethren" into its Prayer Book. 

As C. S. Lewis wrote in "The Death of Words",

"Words, as well as women, can be 'killed with kindness.' And when, how ever reverently, you have killed a word you have also, as far as in you lay, blotted from the human mind the thing that word originally stood for. Men do not long continue to think what they have forgotten how to say."

When Words Offend

 In this Sunday's reading from John 6:56-69 Jesus says some things that cause many of his disciples to walk away. 

Those who eat my flesh and drink my blood abide in me, and I in them. Just as the living Father sent me, and I live because of the Father, so whoever eats me will live because of me. This is the bread that came down from heaven, not like that which your ancestors ate, and they died. But the one who eats this bread will live for ever.’ He said these things while he was teaching in the synagogue at Capernaum.

When many of his disciples heard it, they said, ‘This teaching is difficult; who can accept it?’ But Jesus, being aware that his disciples were complaining about it, said to them, ‘Does this offend you? Then what if you were to see the Son of Man ascending to where he was before? It is the spirit that gives life; the flesh is useless. The words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life. But among you there are some who do not believe.’ For Jesus knew from the first who were the ones that did not believe, and who was the one that would betray him. And he said, ‘For this reason I have told you that no one can come to me unless it is granted by the Father.’

 Because of this many of his disciples turned back and no longer went about with him. So Jesus asked the twelve, ‘Do you also wish to go away?’ Simon Peter answered him, ‘Lord, to whom can we go? You have the words of eternal life. We have come to believe and know that you are the Holy One of God.’

When Jesus asked, "Does this offend you?" I am certain that the reference to eating him was offensive to many at the time. Today we know better, but those who have not accepted Jesus as Lord probably are more offended by Peter's words, "We have come to believe and know that you are the Holy One of God." 

That is enough to cause many to walk away from Jesus in the present age.

I wish they would give Him a chance. 

 

Taking on Water

You know times are bad when Episcopal Pravda prints things like this, 

"...The Episcopal Church still has nearly 7,000 congregations. The number of active Episcopal priests, on the other hand, has fallen over the past 20 years to fewer than 6,000.

 ...congregations of 50 or fewer worshipers make up  most of the church’s congregations (55%)

...in 2022, 12% of Episcopal congregations were served by a priest who is retired. That same year, 54% of priests were listed as part time, more than double the 26% from 2010. 

...Active priests, or those whose employers are actively contributing to the church’s clergy pension fund, peaked in 2004 at 7,886 and have since declined to the current 5,614. During that time, the number of retirees has increased. Retirees first surpassed the number of active priests in 2011 and now total 8,320."

The once mighty ship is going down as many have predicted.

So much for Presiding Bishop Curry's "Revival" plan. The new Presiding Bishop had better start working on a "resurrection plan" soon or Robert Ballard will be exploring the ship's grave site next.

Sing it!

This Sunday's text from Ephesians 5:15-20 contains Paul's thoughts about music in the Church, 

Be careful then how you live, not as unwise people but as wise, making the most of the time, because the days are evil. So do not be foolish, but understand what the will of the Lord is. Do not get drunk with wine, for that is debauchery; but be filled with the Spirit, as you sing psalms and hymns and spiritual songs among yourselves, singing and making melody to the Lord in your hearts, giving thanks to God the Father at all times and for everything in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ. 

After moving to a small ACNA parish, I had to give up singing in a church choir. We are too small and have too few singers to do anything more than making a joyful (for some of us) noise when we gather together. In fact, I became the de facto parish musician based on my history in church and other choirs. Someday we might grow to where we can hire a real musician and have a small choir. 

Am I just dreaming?  

Words of Sanity From Australia to England

 As the Episcopal Organization of England (CofE to some) goes down the tubes, don't say that they have not been warned.  

From the Archbishop of Sydney, Kanishka Raffel, comes this via Sydney Anglicans,

Jesus prays for his church that they would be made holy by the truth of God’s word. Anglicans affirm the ‘ultimate rule and standard of faith’ (ACA Constitution, Fundamental Declarations s2)) of the teaching of Jesus Christ and the word of God revealed in scripture. The decision of the Church of England Synod to approve the use of prayers of blessing for same-sex marriages and to begin moves to allow clergy to enter into same-sex marriages, is a grievous abrogation of its responsibility to uphold the primacy of scripture in the life and ministry of the church. To reject God’s plan for human sexuality is a failure to love people experiencing same-sex attraction and who, like all humanity, are made in his image and designed for his purpose.

This decision is contrary to scripture and to Anglican expressions of the teaching of scripture in our formularies, including the Book of Common Prayer, and Lambeth resolution I.10, clearly affirmed by the Archbishop of Canterbury as the standard of Anglican doctrine as recently as the Lambeth Conference in 2022.

I’m very grateful for the gracious and courageous way in which many English brothers and sisters in Christ have taken a stand in their General Synod for biblical authority and the trustworthiness of Jesus’ teaching on human identity and sexuality.

We express our support for the coalition known as The Alliance which has, in love and integrity, been a clarion voice for truth. The Alliance is a broad grouping of faithful Anglicans from across the spectrum of the church who have in common, fidelity to the scriptures in matters of faith and life, a deep love for the Church of England and commitment to its mission to the nation. Importantly, the Alliance includes Anglicans who experience same-sex attraction and who gladly and courageously affirm the teaching of Jesus concerning marriage and sexuality. We honour them all.

I’m humbled and encouraged by the stance of The Alliance and offer them the hand of fellowship and the assurance of our prayers and support as they contend for the faith once for all delivered to the saints.

I’m grateful too for those whose conscience has not allowed them to remain in the Church of England but who remain committed to Anglican doctrine and mission as members of the Anglican Network in Europe under Bishop Andy Lines and assure them too of our friendship and fellowship in the mission of the gospel in which we are fellow workers.

We note statements from global Anglican fellowships representing the majority of Anglicans worldwide, such as the Global South Fellowship of Anglicans, GAFCON and GAFCON Australia. We rejoice in our common hope, the Lord Jesus Christ, and remain committed to the faithful proclamation of his gospel in love and truth.

…the faith and love that spring from the hope stored up for you in heaven and about which you have already heard in the true message of the gospel that has come to you. Col 1:5,6 (NIV)

Archbishop Kanishka Raffel

17 July 2024.

For more about the Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals to which he refers, go to their web site. 

The Whole Loaf

 This Sunday the Revised Common Lectionary (RCL) slices up John 6:35,41-51. I highlighted in red the missing verses.

35 Jesus said to them, ‘I am the bread of life. Whoever comes to me will never be hungry, and whoever believes in me will never be thirsty.

36 But I said to you that you have seen me and yet do not believe. 37 Everything that the Father gives me will come to me, and anyone who comes to me I will never drive away; 38 for I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me. 39 And this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up on the last day. 40 This is indeed the will of my Father, that all who see the Son and believe in him may have eternal life; and I will raise them up on the last day.’

41 Then the Jews began to complain about him because he said, ‘I am the bread that came down from heaven.’ 42 They were saying, ‘Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? How can he now say, “I have come down from heaven”?’ 43 Jesus answered them, ‘Do not complain among yourselves. 44 No one can come to me unless drawn by the Father who sent me; and I will raise that person up on the last day. 45 It is written in the prophets, “And they shall all be taught by God.” Everyone who has heard and learned from the Father comes to me. 46 Not that anyone has seen the Father except the one who is from God; he has seen the Father. 47 Very truly, I tell you, whoever believes has eternal life. 48 I am the bread of life. 49 Your ancestors ate the manna in the wilderness, and they died. 50 This is the bread that comes down from heaven, so that one may eat of it and not die. 51 I am the living bread that came down from heaven. Whoever eats of this bread will live for ever; and the bread that I will give for the life of the world is my flesh.’

Jesus is the bread of life. It is too bad that the RCL only serves up part of the loaf. 

In Defense of Israel

Melanie Phillips writes opinion columns for The Times of London, the Jerusalem Post and the Jewish Chronicle. She has an excellent piece on the past 100 years of history in "Palestine" pointing out the legal rights that the Jewish people have to govern the area. You can find it at this link.

The Archbishop of Canterbury got it wrong when he said that Israel has been “denying the Palestinian people dignity, freedom and hope” — and that ending its occupation of Palestinian territory is “a legal and moral necessity”. 

They went to Capernaum looking for Jesus

 

A couple of years ago we went on a tour called "Into the Promised Land" and visited numerous places that are found in the Bible. This Sunday's reading from John 6:24-35 mentions one such place, a town which naturally put up a sign for us visitors.

We saw ruins of course.

But what did the crowd in Jesus' time hope to find there?

So when the crowd saw that neither Jesus nor his disciples were there, they themselves got into the boats and went to Capernaum looking for Jesus.

When they found him on the other side of the lake, they said to him, ‘Rabbi, when did you come here?’ Jesus answered them, ‘Very truly, I tell you, you are looking for me, not because you saw signs, but because you ate your fill of the loaves. Do not work for the food that perishes, but for the food that endures for eternal life, which the Son of Man will give you. For it is on him that God the Father has set his seal.’ Then they said to him, ‘What must we do to perform the works of God?’ Jesus answered them, ‘This is the work of God, that you believe in him whom he has sent.’ So they said to him, ‘What sign are you going to give us then, so that we may see it and believe you? What work are you performing? Our ancestors ate the manna in the wilderness; as it is written, “He gave them bread from heaven to eat.” ’ Then Jesus said to them, ‘Very truly, I tell you, it was not Moses who gave you the bread from heaven, but it is my Father who gives you the true bread from heaven. For the bread of God is that which comes down from heaven and gives life to the world.’ They said to him, ‘Sir, give us this bread always.’

Jesus said to them, ‘I am the bread of life. Whoever comes to me will never be hungry, and whoever believes in me will never be thirsty.

Jesus' words were upsetting to many then just as they would be today if you were to tell them to an unbeliever. 

Come to think of it, many so-called believers would probably have a hard time swallowing that if they were to think about it. 

Not Another Post About the Drag Last Supper

 The recent opening ceremonies at for the Paris Olympic Games has been characterized as the closing ceremonies for mankind after people witnessed various displays by LGBTQetc non-athletic types and especially the drag queen tableau that had a strange resemblance to the Last Supper of our Lord. 

Much has been written about this, and let me add my two dollar bill. 

My uber liberal Christian friends immediately posted that those who object to the image were too stupid to see that the drag queens were re-creating a bacchanal or a feast for Dionysus. I didn't buy it, but they certainly did. 

My conservative Christian friends posted their outrage.

Myself, I am not surprised that a bunch of Parisian drag queens would pull a stunt like this. Nor am I surprised the news media would televise some of the displays. Should we stand up and tell the world that this was offensive, blasphemous, or outrageous?

Even if they were just posing as worshippers of a Greek or Roman god, then there is still a problem:

“You shall have no other gods beside me."

I think that we first need to pray for these people, both the performers and my uber liberal friends that they see the error of their ways.

Second, we do need to let the world know that God should not be mocked. There is eternal judgement involved here. 

Third, don't watch NBC's broadcast of the Olympics. 

Fourth, we should tell the world that we do not accept such behavior lest those who are weak in faith like my uber liberal friends get dragged down further from the Apostolic faith.