Sunday, January 12, 2014

Yet Another Reason to Renounce Satan

Following up on my last post concerning the proposed changes in the CofE Baptismal Rite in which references to the Devil are eliminated, I found more evidence of the Devil's come back plans in this story from the AP,

OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) — A satanic group unveiled designs Monday for a 7-foot-tall statue of Satan it wants to put at the Oklahoma state Capitol, where a Ten Commandments monument was placed in 2012.
The New York-based Satanic Temple formally submitted its application to a panel that oversees the Capitol grounds, including an artist's rendering that depicts Satan as Baphomet, a goat-headed figure with horns, wings and a long beard that's often used as a symbol of the occult. In the rendering, Satan is sitting in a pentagram-adorned throne with smiling children next to him.

"The monument has been designed to reflect the views of Satanists in Oklahoma City and beyond," temple spokesman Lucien Greaves said in a statement. "The statue will also have a functional purpose as a chair where people of all ages may sit on the lap of Satan for inspiration and contemplation."
I can see it now, the kiddies sitting on the horny old goat's lap and telling him what they want for Christmas.
On its website, the Satanic Temple explains that it "seeks to separate Religion from Superstition by acknowledging religious belief as a metaphorical framework with which we construct a narrative context for our goals and works.
Wait a second, I think I have heard that before. Was it Spong, or was it Borg?
"Satan stands as the ultimate icon for the selfless revolt against tyranny, free & rational inquiry, and the responsible pursuit of happiness," the website says.
In this case Satan sits, but in any case he represents the ultimate revolt against God.

I think it is safe to say that the satanic forces are attempting a comeback.

Where should we turn to help in combatting Baphomet and his minions?

Maybe we should look for advice from Holy Scripture.
"Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness;And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace;Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked.And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God:Praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, and watching thereunto with all perseverance and supplication for all saints;" Ephesians 6:11-18 King James Version (KJV)

P.S. For those trying to match the Satanist's reasoning with the liberal theologian, check this one out,
  "But do virgin births, multiplying loaves and fish, and changing water into wine ever happen anywhere? If I became persuaded that they do, then I would entertain the possibility that the stories about Jesus reporting such events also contain history remembered. But what I cannot do as a historian is to say that Jesus could do such things even though nobody else has ever been able to. Thus I regard these as purely metaphorical narratives." - Marcus Borg Reading the Bible Again... for the First Time Taking the Bible Seriously But Not Literally 


  1. I'm not sure which is worse. Is calling evil "good" any worse than calling what is true a lie? Spong and Borg took an oath to protect the faith and went about undermining the church from the "inside".

  2. What is worse? Calling evil "good" or calling the truth a lie by those entrusted with guarding the truth?

  3. “Assuredly, I say to you, all sins will be forgiven the sons of men, and whatever blasphemies they may utter; but he who blasphemes against the Holy Spirit never has forgiveness, but is subject to eternal condemnation” Mark 3

  4. Jim Beckner9:39 AM

    Perhaps we send this to the Archbishop? and your previous column. Another article on the rewriting of the B of CP is found at, "How Primitive Sociology is Killing the Church of England."